The Instrument as an Unintended Factor in Auditions



 The Instrument as an Unintended Factor in Auditions

Even when musicians are evaluated with complete integrity, audition conditions may introduce variables that adjudicators cannot fully control.

In a symphony orchestra audition, two musicians may have nearly equivalent ability, technical skill, and experience, yet one may be assessed more favourably partly because of the instrument used.

For example, Musician A may play an exceptional Stradivarius, while Musician B uses a competent but less distinguished instrument. The panel may hear greater richness, complexity, or projection from Musician A and attribute it to musicianship, when some of it may stem from the instrument itself.

A superior instrument may also be more responsive and easier to play, requiring less effort to produce sound, dynamics, and expression, thereby enabling a wider expressive range with less exertion.

This creates a methodological concern: the instrument’s advantage may be neither intentional nor fully perceptible to the panel, which responds only to the resulting sound.

As a result, equally skilled musicians may perform under unequal conditions, with one benefiting from greater ease, tonal richness, and projection, while the other must work harder to achieve similar results.

The panel may remain entirely impartial in intention while still being influenced by this inherent inequality.

The issue is not whether a Stradivarius makes a musician superior—it does not—but whether its quality and responsiveness can affect how performance is perceived.

I contend that it can.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Image
How our childhood environment is a major factor in how our destinies unfold. I don’t know if you have ever stopped to think about why you are who you are or what makes you make one decision over another? As a young musician I once had a heated discussion with a fellow musician about whether we could control our own destinies: he was sure we could not and I, (in my naivety), believed we could. As I grew older I started to think more and more about this question and I gradually came to realize that my friend was right: we have no control over our destinies. Here’s why I have come to the conclusion that we do not really control our destinies: Where you are born, who your parents are, how you were brought up and whether you were loved or not as a child are all enormous factors in how you think and make decisions. Then there is also the gene factor that contributes to the way your health and emotions work, (or don't work). We don’t have control of any of these factors Here is the story ...
Read more
Image
  Richard Wyce - Cellist The changing world of the 21st century. August 21, 2022 Radio, Television, and now the Internet, have completely changed how human beings communicate with one another . Are we overcrowding our brains with too much information and if so, how does that affect how we live? For as long as I can remember I have been asking myself the question: how can I say something new to my fellow human beings that hasn’t been said time and time again before?  My father always told me that every word we say has been thought of and said before; so if that is true, how can we say something original? Perhaps the Arts are one answer? Traditionally Music, Painting and the  Visual Arts, and Writing have always been the preferred methods, but with today’s mass media this has all somehow got jumbled up together, and is so accessible to the general public that we seem to have lost the ability to discern the difference between greatness and, at its best, mediocrity. Indeed mu...
Read more
Image
 My brother, Jon Wyce the busker. Busker:  a person who performs music or other entertainment in the street or another public place for monetary donations . Introduction. My brother was born Jonathan Charles Wyce on January 24th 1949  He was born with yellow jaundice which was very serious at that time. The doctors did not think he would survive, but he did, although weakened and somewhat fragile as a consequence of the illness. Because of his fragile state my mother always had a special bond with my brother and was always quite protective of him. The only person my father really loved was my mother, so because of her, he was less of a bully with him than he was with me or my sister. Also, because of his more passive, gentle nature my brother never was able to fight back against my father; he would either say nothing or just leave the room. This used to infuriate my father, but he couldn’t do much about it because it would upset my mother too much. As Jonathan always used...
Read more